Case Review
case file // classic plays

The Railroads — Marketing Myopia

The railroads thought they were in the railroad business. They were in the transportation business — and missed it! The original cautionary tale of defining your game too narrowly.

Brand
U.S. Railroads
Era
1960s
campaign
Marketing Myopia
ref ruling
Penalty
campaign footage

o1/ The Play

In his 1960 Harvard Business Review essay “Marketing Myopia,” Theodore Levitt used the American railroads as his lead example. They let themselves decline, he argued, not because demand for transportation fell — it grew — but because they defined themselves as being in the railroad business rather than the transportation business. Cars, trucks, and planes ate their market while they protected track.

02/ Why It Failed

This is a flag on strategy, not execution. The railroads were product-oriented instead of customer-oriented: they asked “how do we run more trains?” instead of “how do people and goods want to move?” A too-narrow definition of the business blinded them to where the customer was already heading.

03/ The Ref’s Call

Red flag, fifteen yards, and the textbook example every founder should know. Ask what business you’re actually in — the job the customer hires you for — not the product you happen to ship today.

Foul - Primary

The IOC threw multiple flags at Nike, eventually tightening sponsorship regulations worldwide to prevent such blatant parasitic branding in future years.

Foul - secondary

Reebok suffered a significant ROI loss as their exclusive rights were diluted by the sheer volume of Nike's proximity marketing.

Ref's Scorecard
Market impact
9.8
/ 10
Execution
9.8
/ 10
Efficacy
9.6
/ 10
Final:
9.8
verdict:
Marketing Failure and thus Business Failure
case file
Ref Ruling
Penalty
Flag level
Red Flag
rule reference
9
open in the rulebook >

concepts leveraged

#
PS-021
FOMO (Fear of Missing Out)
The anxiety that others are enjoying rewarding experiences one is absent from; in marketing, content and offers are framed so the audience feels they'll miss a valuable or social opportunity if they don't act.
View concept >
#
PS-011
Loss Aversion
The behavioral-economics finding (Kahneman & Tversky) that people feel a loss about twice as strongly as an equivalent gain — so framing offers around what's forfeited by not acting can outperform gain-framed messaging.
View concept >
#
PS-007
Scarcity & Urgency
Tactics that raise perceived value and prompt action by signaling limited supply (scarcity) or limited time (urgency), drawing on loss aversion and the fear of missing the window.
View concept >
#
PS-002
Social Proof
The tendency to look to others' actions and opinions to guide our own — so showing that others trust, buy, or endorse something makes new audiences more likely to follow (Cialdini's principle of social proof).
View concept >
#
ST-014
Guerrilla Marketing
An unconventional, low-budget approach that relies on creativity, surprise, and high-impact placement to earn outsized attention and word-of-mouth instead of paid media weight.
View concept >

Think you have a winning play?

Get a professional review of your current campaign. Our refs will find the flags before your competitors do.